In February, the analysis of the offers published on LinkedIn Italia highlights an important fact: the request of the Communication Manager figure is no longer episodic or sectoral, but systemic.
Adding up the main equivalent names (Communication Manager, Corporate Communications, Communication Manager, Communication Manager and variants), there are more than 1,700 active searches over the observed period.
Organizational communication is therefore configured as a function permanently requested by organizations and no longer as occasional support.
Open searches by professional name
In the month of February, there are active:
- 427 “Communication Manager” positions (LinkedIn))
- 364 “Communication Manager” positions (LinkedIn))
- 219 “Corporate Communication Manager” positions (LinkedIn))
- 129 “Communication Manager” positions (LinkedIn))
- 486 ) “Communication Manager” positions (LinkedIn))
- 50 , “Marketing & Communication Manager” positions (LinkedIn))
- 36 ) “Regional Communication Manager” positions (LinkedIn))
- 31 ) “HR Communication Manager” positions (LinkedIn))
) Total observed: 1,742 open positions
The figure is significant because it does not represent a single profession but a family of roles that perform the same function: the governance of organizational communication.
Where figure
1 is requested. Large companies and industrial groups
Predominant type of request: Corporate Communication Manager
Incidence: about 20— 25%
Context:
- multinationals
- listed groups
- structured manufacturing companies
Motivation: reputation management, stakeholders and institutional communication; here the figure works close to the general management.
2. Service companies and consumer brands
Prevailing type: Communication Manager/Marketing & Communication Manager
Incidence: about 30— 35%
Context:
- retail
- energy
- tourism
- technology
- telecommunications
Motivation: integrating marketing, customer care and presence digital; here communication becomes a user experience.
3. Public administrations and organizations
Prevailing type: Communication Manager
Incidence: about 20— 25%
Context:
- local authorities
- national bodies
- universities
- healthcare
- investee companies
Motivation: the digitalization of services requires comprehensibility of information; communication becomes part of administrative functioning.
4. SMEs and growing organizations
Prevailing type: Communication Manager
Incidence: about 15— 20%
Context:
- companies between 20 and 250 employees
- expanding companies
- mature startups
Motivation: transition from spontaneous communication to coordinated communication; the figure appears when channels increase.
Entry mode
The February offers show four recurring patterns.
Internal structural insertion
Typical of mature organizations.
Communication is a permanent function.
Cross-cutting coordination role
Very common in service companies.
Not operational, but of integration.
Ongoing advice
Disseminated in SMEs.
We need governance, not outsourcing.
Hybrid or remote positions
Around 25— 35% of ads involve hybrid or flexible work (LinkedIn))
) Because demand is growing
Observing ads highlights three main causes.
1. Multiplication of channels
Sites, social networks, apps and platforms coexist in the same information ecosystem, coordination is needed.
2. Measurability of communication
Digital data makes communication evaluable, interpretation is needed.
3. Direct relationship with the public
Organizations communicate without intermediaries, accountability is needed.
Emerging indication
The figure appears when the organization reaches a certain level of communicative complexity. It is not a starting position
but a position of maturity.
Conclusion of the observatory — February
The high number of researches indicates a structural change: communication enters the organization as a governing function.
It's no longer about promotion or image, but about understanding, consistency and informational reliability.
The trend suggests that the introduction of the Communication Manager represents today one of the main indicators of organizational evolution.